I find it rather funny that we have such a fuss being raised about laws requiring voters to show ID at the polls that a case has to be heard by the Supreme Court on the issue. What strikes me is that:
- if we had more voters voting, whatever fraud the voter ID laws are meant to combat would have less effect in a larger pool of ballots
- the plantiffs have not demonstrated that this law has prevented anyone from voting
- voting fraud is more rare at the polling place than it is in absentee voting where no ID is required
This seems like another case of the law being used to address minutia
